On 01/31/2015 08:20 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 31 January 2015 at 20:02, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:
Hello Masahiro,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:11:02 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
<yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
This series can be applied on the current u-boot/master
(commit 37b608a52dcb133)
I'd rather not have all mach-* directories just below arch/arm/. Can't
they be created under arch/arm/soc/ instead? That would give a cleaner
structure IMO.
It does save a level and I am forever typing cpu/armv7 to get what
feels like nowhere...this is what the kernel does and it does seem
convenient.
Do note that arch/arm/mach* doesn't/won't entirely match what the Linux
kernel does.
In Linux, arch/arm64 doesn't have mach-* sub-directories, and the
arm/arm64 architectures are different so don't share the code in
arch/arm/mach-tegra, so there's work underway to move stuff out of
arch/arm/mach-tegra and into either appropriate subsystem directories or
drivers/soc/tegra.
Given all that, I suspect we should decide the directory layout of
U-Boot based on what's best for U-Boot, not by trying to chase the
changing target of the Linux kernel.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
