Hello Simon, On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:23:05 -0700, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Albert,
> [...] > > I think the ARM core name is a convenient way of splitting things up > and has served us well. But now the common elements are more at the > SOC level. Yes the idea of arch/arm/soc/mach-... is more pure from a > hierarchical point of view, but arch/arm/mach-... would be my > preference. I feel that arch/arm is underused now, and U-Boot is > growing so we should try to 'balance' the source tree, making sure > each level of the hierarchy justifies itself with enough > files/subdirs, etc. > > [...] Can't say I like directory entry count as a criterion for structuring a source code tree, but apart from that nitpick, the rest of your and others' explanations (skipped here for clarity) makes sense. Oh well, I'll have to learn to live without a soc subdir. :) Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
