Hello Albert,

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Simon,
> 
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Albert,
> > >
> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > >> Hello Simon,
> > >>
> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff;
> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series
> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be
> > >> applied exactly?
> > >
> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series
> > > starting here:
> > >
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/
> > >
> > > The cover letter is here:
> > >
> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429
> > >
> > > So that is all now.
> > 
> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the
> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working
> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5.
> 
> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4.

V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a
try at u-boot-dm/spl-working.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to