Hello Simon, On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:57:05 -0700, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Albert, > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Simon, > >> > >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Albert, > >> > > >> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Hi Albert, > >> > > > >> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Simon, > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal > >> > >> stuff; > >> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > >> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > >> > >> applied exactly? > >> > > > >> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series > >> > > starting here: > >> > > > >> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ > >> > > > >> > > The cover letter is here: > >> > > > >> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 > >> > > > >> > > So that is all now. > >> > > >> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the > >> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working > >> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. > >> > >> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. > > > > V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a > > try at u-boot-dm/spl-working. > > OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied > something up. I can resend if you like.
Well, if you can re-send rebase over current u-boot[-arm]/master, that would be nice. :) > Regards, > Simon Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
