On Thursday 09 July 2009 14:49:07 Peter Tyser wrote: > > > Move lib_ppc to lib/ppc > > > Move lib_arm to lib/arm > > > Move lib_i386 to lib/i386 > > > Move lib_m68k to lib/m68k > > > Move remaining lib_<ARCH> to lib/<ARCH> > > > > why is ppc/arm/i386/m68k special ? seems like it'd make more sense to > > either have one patch for every arch or squash them altogether. a squash > > here sounds ok to me. > > I originally didn't squash them all together because of the 100KB > mailing list limit. It looked like I'd need to only use 1 line of patch > context to get the lib_<arch> changes to be < 100KB, so I split them up > instead. > > I originally was going to do each arch independently, but realized there > was no real significant change for avr32, blackfin, mips, nios, nios2, > and sparc so I squashed them together.
since it's pretty much all renames, i would have thought git-format-patch with the -M option would produce a summary that is under 100kB ? > Anyway, that's the logic, I can resubmit if necessary. Or the arch > changes can be squashed together by whoever pushes the changes to get > around the mailing list limit. up to Wolfgang how he wants it -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
