On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 15:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009 14:49:07 Peter Tyser wrote: > > > > Move lib_ppc to lib/ppc > > > > Move lib_arm to lib/arm > > > > Move lib_i386 to lib/i386 > > > > Move lib_m68k to lib/m68k > > > > Move remaining lib_<ARCH> to lib/<ARCH> > > > > > > why is ppc/arm/i386/m68k special ? seems like it'd make more sense to > > > either have one patch for every arch or squash them altogether. a squash > > > here sounds ok to me. > > > > I originally didn't squash them all together because of the 100KB > > mailing list limit. It looked like I'd need to only use 1 line of patch > > context to get the lib_<arch> changes to be < 100KB, so I split them up > > instead. > > > > I originally was going to do each arch independently, but realized there > > was no real significant change for avr32, blackfin, mips, nios, nios2, > > and sparc so I squashed them together. > > since it's pretty much all renames, i would have thought git-format-patch > with > the -M option would produce a summary that is under 100kB ?
Without the -M option the patches were hundreds of KB, with -M and only 2 lines of context they are still pretty large (as sent to the mailing list): 55K 0002-Move-lib_ppc-to-lib-ppc.patch 7.2K 0003-Move-lib_arm-to-lib-arm.patch 6.7K 0004-Move-lib_i386-to-lib-i386.patch 16K 0005-Move-lib_m68k-to-lib-m68k.patch 20K 0006-Move-remaining-lib_-ARCH-to-lib-ARCH.patch 98K 0007-Move-lib_generic-to-lib-generic.patch > > Anyway, that's the logic, I can resubmit if necessary. Or the arch > > changes can be squashed together by whoever pushes the changes to get > > around the mailing list limit. > > up to Wolfgang how he wants it Wolfgang, let me know if you want this series reorganized. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
