Hello Marek, On 15-05-18 19:09:58, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 03:06:28 PM, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote: > > From: Sanchayan Maity <[email protected]> > > > > Add a weak function board_ehci_hcd_init which can be used by the board > > file for board specific initialisation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > > What I do not like is that you're sending a patch series which affects > multiple subsystems and which contains patches which should go through > multiple trees. Yet, you submit it all in one huge series.
If required I can send in the last two patches affecting the USB susbsystem later once the rest of the patchset gets merged, if this is not acceptable?. Since these last two were dependent on the GPIO patches I thought perhaps it is better that they go along with the GPIO patches as a coherent whole. > > I guess the best way out of this is to push all this stuff via u-boot-imx now? > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut Thanks & Regards, Sanchayan Maity. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
