On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 08:52:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hello Marek,
Hi! > On 15-05-18 19:09:58, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 03:06:28 PM, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote: > > > From: Sanchayan Maity <[email protected]> > > > > > > Add a weak function board_ehci_hcd_init which can be used by the board > > > file for board specific initialisation. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > > > > What I do not like is that you're sending a patch series which affects > > multiple subsystems and which contains patches which should go through > > multiple trees. Yet, you submit it all in one huge series. > > If required I can send in the last two patches affecting the USB > susbsystem later once the rest of the patchset gets merged, if this is > not acceptable?. > > Since these last two were dependent on the GPIO patches I thought > perhaps it is better that they go along with the GPIO patches as a > coherent whole. I think if there's no oposition, just push this all via u-boot-imx . I don't plan to block it, but subsystem stuff should usually go though subsystem trees. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
