Hi Peng, On 29/06/2015 10:06, Peng Fan wrote:
>> There is an important goal: having a single U-Boot image running on >> boards that can have different (pin compatible) SOCs. We get this >> managing the different layout of the IOMUXC, that was maybe the most >> difficult part - why do we go back when we can't ? > > Get you. > I saw the code in gw_ventana.c to detect the DTB at runtime. > To imx6q/qp/dl sabreauto board, there is no place to store info such as > ventana_board_info. But this is a good point that gw_ventana use the way > to do runtime check, which can make one image goal for pin compatible SOCs. Right - and this will be appreciate by sabreauto customers, who should not deal with several U-Boot images. And maybe asking why board is not booting after installing the wrong one. > To the i.mx6qp board patch, I can use this way to remove the > DTB related #ifdefs, use the way that gw_ventana uses. Will split the current > patch into two, one to refacotr the current code to use runtime DTB detect, > the second one is to add i.mx6qp support. It looks like a nice plan ;-). Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot