Hi Simon,
2015-09-04 13:03 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <[email protected]>: > Hi Masahiro, > > On 3 September 2015 at 21:43, Masahiro Yamada > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Commit c5acf4a2b3c6 ("pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDs") >> added some additional change that was not mentioned in the git-log. >> >> That commit added dm_scan_fdt_node() in the pinctrl uclass binding. >> It should be handled by the simple-bus driver, and it is totally >> unrelated to pinctrl in the first place. > > Actually you mentioned this before I never got back to it, sorry. And, I was not tracking it after I mentioned that. Sorry. > Do you mean that pinctrl is not supposed to have child nodes with > their own compatible strings? I do not mean that. It is OK for a pinctrl device to have child nodes with compatible strings. This should not be restricted. But, it is not the feature of the pinctrl framework. The pinctrl is not a bus. Binding child devices should be a task for a bus, in this case, the simple-bus. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
