Hi Masahiro, On 4 September 2015 at 01:47, Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > 2015-09-04 13:03 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <[email protected]>: >> Hi Masahiro, >> >> On 3 September 2015 at 21:43, Masahiro Yamada >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Commit c5acf4a2b3c6 ("pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDs") >>> added some additional change that was not mentioned in the git-log. >>> >>> That commit added dm_scan_fdt_node() in the pinctrl uclass binding. >>> It should be handled by the simple-bus driver, and it is totally >>> unrelated to pinctrl in the first place. >> >> Actually you mentioned this before I never got back to it, sorry. > > And, I was not tracking it after I mentioned that. Sorry. > > > >> Do you mean that pinctrl is not supposed to have child nodes with >> their own compatible strings? > > I do not mean that. > > It is OK for a pinctrl device to have child nodes with compatible strings. > This should not be restricted. > > > But, it is not the feature of the pinctrl framework. > The pinctrl is not a bus. > > > Binding child devices should be a task for a bus, in this case, the > simple-bus.
Hmm, so here we want to do some simple-bus processing as well as something else, using the list of compatible strings. Is this something we can arrange within the existing driver model approach? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
