Hi Tobias,
> exynos_mmc_init() always returns zero, so for the caller
> it looks like it never fails.
>
> Correct this by returning the error code of process_nodes().
> For process_nodes() do something similar and return early
> when do_sdhci_init() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> index e9c43a9..bc2102a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,11 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int
> node_list[], int count) printf("%s: failed to decode dev
> %d\n", __func__, i); return -1;
> }
> - do_sdhci_init(host);
> +
> + if (do_sdhci_init(host)) {
> + printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n",
> __func__, i);
> + return -2;
IMHO, it would be better to write this code as follows:
ret = do_sdhci_init(host);
if (ret) {
printf();
return ret;
}
In the above code you read the exact return code from do_sdhci_init()
and then you pass it to upper layer.
Returning only -2 is far less informational.
> + }
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -201,8 +205,6 @@ int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob)
> COMPAT_SAMSUNG_EXYNOS_MMC, node_list,
> SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS);
>
> - process_nodes(blob, node_list, count);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return process_nodes(blob, node_list, count);
> }
> #endif
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
