Dear "J.C. Wren", In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did > I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was solved by > adding a __xxxxx.S function the u-boot library.
In a perfect world the GCC provided libgcc.a would be "just working" and we did not have to bother about all that. But libgcc.a fo ARM is obviously not perfect, and causes problems. So Jean-Christophe suggested to use the alternative implementation he wanted to copy from the Linux code - which again is supposed to allow to use the code in question without changes. But for some reason Jean-Christophe does not post a patch to add this Linux based new library code, but rather suggests to change the code instead - which I do not understand, and which I tend to disagree with. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] Perl itself is usually pretty good about telling you what you shouldn't do. :-) - Larry Wall in <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
