Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "J.C. Wren", > > In message <[email protected]> you > wrote: >> I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did >> I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was solved by >> adding a __xxxxx.S function the u-boot library. > > In a perfect world the GCC provided libgcc.a would be "just working" > and we did not have to bother about all that. > > But libgcc.a fo ARM is obviously not perfect, and causes problems. So > Jean-Christophe suggested to use the alternative implementation he > wanted to copy from the Linux code - which again is supposed to allow > to use the code in question without changes.
Just to get an idea what has to be done for this: Do we talk about http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054627.html without the changes to top level Makefile arm_config.mk ? That is, updating that patch and removing the Makefile and arm_config.mk changes would be what we want? Best regards Dirk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
