Dear Scott Wood, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > And please correct me if I am wrong, but J-C can't actually pull these > > patches into his next branch correct? > > Right, not yet. > > > That is because it will require 2 of the NAND patches that I sent a week > > ago. > > > > Thus you might have to accept the DM355 EVM config update patch as well > > which actually enables the NAND support. > > I could do that with an ACK from JC if it does not depend on anything in > his tree -- or I could send Wolfgang a -next pull request and then JC > could sync with that.
Jean-Christophe has acked this one - see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/65792/focus=66144 But I'm concerned about direct register accesses. We really should insist on using proper accessor calls. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] Always leave room to add an explanation if it doesn't work out. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
