Hi Stefan,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Roese <[email protected]> wrote:
> With this addition, the eMMC device available on the congatec and DFI
> BayTrail SoM is detected correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> Cc: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bin Meng <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c | 1 +
> include/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
> b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
> index b31f24e..9868de0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> static struct pci_device_id mmc_supported[] = {
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDIO },
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDCARD },
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_EMMC2 },
pure nits, should we use VALLEYVIEW_EMMC2? or should we change
previous VALLEYVIEW_SDIO/SDCARD to BYT_SDIO/SDCARD, for consistency?
> {},
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/pci_ids.h b/include/pci_ids.h
> index 17a01a0..e63b94f 100644
> --- a/include/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/pci_ids.h
> @@ -2606,6 +2606,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_IDE_ALT 0x0f21
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SATA 0x0f22
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SATA_ALT 0x0f23
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_EMMC2 0x0f50
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82541ER 0x1078
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82541GI_LF 0x107c
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82542 0x1000
> --
Regards,
Bin
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
