Hi Bin,
On 26.09.2016 08:33, Bin Meng wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote:
With this addition, the eMMC device available on the congatec and DFI
BayTrail SoM is detected correctly.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c | 1 +
include/pci_ids.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
index b31f24e..9868de0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
static struct pci_device_id mmc_supported[] = {
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDIO },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDCARD },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_EMMC2 },
pure nits, should we use VALLEYVIEW_EMMC2? or should we change
previous VALLEYVIEW_SDIO/SDCARD to BYT_SDIO/SDCARD, for consistency?
I've taken the new name from the Linux driver as you might have
already suspected. I would prefer to change the other (old) names
to the Linux ones. I can prepare a v2 of this patch or a follow-up
patch for this. What would you prefer?
Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
