Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote: >> Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 03/01/2017 05:36 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote: >>>> This reverts commit b63b46313ed29e9b0c36b3d6b9407f6eade40c8f. >>>> >>>> The Cadence QSPI device does not work with caching (introduced with >>>> the bounce buffer in this commit) on the Altera SoC platform. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Rush <jason.r...@gd-ms.com> >>> >>> Do we really need the reverts or can we just fix the commit(s) up somehow ? >>> >> >> Would you prefer I squash the 2 reverts and the subsequent patch together >> as a single commit? > > I would prefer if you answered my question :) So let me re-iterate, can > we incrementally fix the driver instead of doing the revert(s) ?
I think I misunderstood your question. Could you clarify what you mean by incrementally fix the driver? Are you asking if there is a way to fix the cache issue with the CQSPI on the Altera SoC platform? If so, I don't know if I have the knowledge to answer that. Do you have any suggestions on where one would start looking to fix the caching problem? Just so we have a common understanding, the reverts along with the subsequent patches get the CQSPI device working again on the Altera SoC as it used to in previous versions of U-Boot, and the CQSPI should continue to work for the TI devices Vignesh's patches were intended to fix. Regards, Jason _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot