On 03/07/2017 04:18 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote: > Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote: >>> Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> On 03/01/2017 05:36 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote: >>>>> This reverts commit b63b46313ed29e9b0c36b3d6b9407f6eade40c8f. >>>>> >>>>> The Cadence QSPI device does not work with caching (introduced with >>>>> the bounce buffer in this commit) on the Altera SoC platform. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Rush <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Do we really need the reverts or can we just fix the commit(s) up somehow ? >>>> >>> >>> Would you prefer I squash the 2 reverts and the subsequent patch together >>> as a single commit? >> >> I would prefer if you answered my question :) So let me re-iterate, can >> we incrementally fix the driver instead of doing the revert(s) ? > > I think I misunderstood your question. Could you clarify what you mean by > incrementally fix the driver?
That means change it to the final form without reverting patches. > Are you asking if there is a way to fix the cache issue with the CQSPI on the > Altera SoC platform? If so, I don't know if I have the knowledge to answer > that. > Do you have any suggestions on where one would start looking to fix the > caching problem? Uh, there is a cache problem on socfpga ? Is this series working around it then ? > Just so we have a common understanding, the reverts along with the > subsequent patches get the CQSPI device working again on the Altera SoC as > it used to in previous versions of U-Boot, and the CQSPI should continue to > work for the TI devices Vignesh's patches were intended to fix. > > Regards, > Jason > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
