On 02/02/18 15:02, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Where do we stand on this: can we reuse IH_TYPE_TEE, will be use IH_TYPE_OPTEE
or will there be a new IH_TYPE_OPTEE_SPL?
I think because you aren't doing anything different with the image type
you can reuse IH_TYPE_TEE
This
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OPTEE)
+ case IH_OS_OP_TEE:
+ debug("Jumping to U-Boot via OP-TEE\n");
+ spl_optee_entry(NULL, NULL, spl_image->fdt_addr,
+ (void *)spl_image.entry_point);
+ break;
+#endif
could just as easily be this
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OPTEE)
+ case IH_TYPE_TEE:
+ debug("Jumping to U-Boot via OP-TEE\n");
+ spl_optee_entry(NULL, NULL, spl_image->fdt_addr,
+ (void *)spl_image.entry_point);
+ break;
+#endif
should be a matter of just replacing the call to mkimage to use
mkimage -A arm -T tee
instead of
mkimage -A arm -T optee
and the suggested change above.. case IH_OS_OP_TEE -> case IH_TYPE_TEE
---
bod
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
