On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ashish Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jagan Teki [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:31 AM >> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]> >> Cc: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>; York Sun <[email protected]>; >> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <[email protected]>; Poonam Aggrwal >> <[email protected]>; Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>; u- >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: mtd: spi-nor: new NXP FlexSPI driver location & framework to >> use ? >> >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Dear Jagan, >> > >> > NXP is coming up with new FlexSPI controller. It is similar to existing >> > QSPI with >> enhanced feature-set. >> > We have the driver ready as per existing framework i.e. driver/spi. >> > >> > From recend discussion, we go to know about framework change. >> > Migration of qspi drivers in u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ >> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git branch mtd-spinor-working. >> > >> > We are in dilemma for sending FlexSPI driver upstream. >> > Do we follow existing framework i.e. driver/spi or new proposed framework >> i.e. u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ >> > >> > Also, do we have any timeline of u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ to become >> default. >> >> Idea is to move spi-nor, mtd-spinor-working is paused because of non-dm >> drivers accessing. We are clear that we can't create another legacy layer to >> access spi-nor for the sake of non-dm driver to work which eventually >> ended-up >> another mess and also no one take care of non-dm conversion to dm if we give >> such feasibility. So we exported a deadline for full SPI/SPI_FLASH DM >> conversion >> till v2018.09. Once all these relevant conversion done, will try to move. >> > Hello Jagan, > > You have mentioned here > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot-spi.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4e68d3aa8178f6aa63a79c4f8f459c0e3ed58e8 > > Snip from above link: > +Partially converted: > + drivers/spi/atcspi200_spi.c > + drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c > + drivers/spi/fsl_dspi.c > + drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c > > That fsl_qspi.c is partial converted to DM model, is there any guide line to > follow for missing stuff ?
We should fully convert the driver into dm, no #ifdef CONFIG_DM_SPI _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
