> -----Original Message-----
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of
> Prabhakar Kushwaha
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:55 PM
> To: Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com>
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] mtd: spi-nor: new NXP FlexSPI driver location &
> framework to use ?
> Thanks Jagan,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.t...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:31 AM
> > To: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; York Sun
> > <york....@nxp.com>; Yogesh Narayan Gaur
> > Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggr...@nxp.com>; Ashish Kumar
> > <ashish.ku...@nxp.com>; u- b...@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: mtd: spi-nor: new NXP FlexSPI driver location & framework
> > to use ?
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha
> > <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com> wrote:
> > > Dear Jagan,
> > >
> > > NXP is coming up with new FlexSPI controller. It is similar to
> > > existing QSPI
> > with enhanced feature-set.
> > > We have the driver ready as per existing framework i.e. driver/spi.
> > >
> > > From recend discussion, we go to know about framework change.
> > > Migration of qspi drivers in u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/
> > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git branch mtd-spinor-working.
> > >
> > > We are in dilemma for sending FlexSPI driver upstream.
> > > Do we follow existing framework i.e. driver/spi or new proposed
> > framework i.e. u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/
> > >
> > > Also, do we have any timeline of u-boot-spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ to
> > become default.
> > Idea is to move spi-nor, mtd-spinor-working is paused because of
> > non-dm drivers accessing.
> This means, flexspi controller driver should be upstream'ed via u-boot-
> spi/drivers/mtd/spi-nor branch mtd-spinor-working
Please help me with the query.
We don’t want to end up with 2 FlexSPI drivers being posted in upstream.
U-Boot mailing list