On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 08:24:26AM -0700, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:23:39PM -0700, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> >> We can use compatibles instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anars...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> v3: use ehci_sunxi_cfg instead of id
> >>
> >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-sunxi.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sunxi.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sunxi.c
> >> index 360efc9116..35fbe03331 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sunxi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sunxi.c
> >> @@ -22,11 +22,17 @@
> >> #define AHB_CLK_DIST 1
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +struct ehci_sunxi_cfg {
> >> + bool has_reset;
> >> + u32 extra_ahb_gate_mask;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> struct ehci_sunxi_priv {
> >> struct ehci_ctrl ehci;
> >> struct sunxi_ccm_reg *ccm;
> >> int ahb_gate_mask; /* Mask of ahb_gate0 clk gate bits for this hcd */
> >
> > Ideally this should be moved to the ehci_sunxi_cfg (and this is true
> > for OHCI as well) function for consistency, but that can be done in a
> > subsequent patch.
>
> ahb_gate_mask is per-controller, i.e. it differs for EHCI0 and EHCI1
> so it can't be moved to ehci_sunxi_cfg.
Ah, right. Nevermind then :)
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
