Hi Lukasz, On 10/01/19 10:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Stefano, >
[snip] >> There is a topic I would like to check. Stefan introduces with his >> patches a DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE that is still missing in your >> patches. I solved the conflict (not yet pushed to -next) as : >> >> while (!(readl(&ddrmr->cr[80]) & DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE)) >> udelay(10); >> writel(DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE, &ddrmr->cr[81]); >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION >> ddrmc_calibration(ddrmr); >> #endif >> >> But I have no idea if DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE should be done >> before the calibration of maybe after. Could you help me ? > > I've already rebased (DDR calibration code) on top of Stefan's patches: > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/testing > > The code in question looks like in below link: > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-imx/ddrmc-vf610.c;h=9a8e2f6aad10adc45fa791d24ffad52c42c5c492;hb=refs/heads/testing#l231 ok, thanks - so the DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE is called before calibration. I have already did this by rebasing myself. There is no need you repost, I have merged yours patches into my -next branch. Regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
