On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:43:59AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hello, > > Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> wrote on Sun, 18 Nov 2018 > 21:13:47 +0100: > > > Hello, > > > > Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> wrote on Sun, 18 Nov 2018 > > 21:11:47 +0100: > > > > > A Coverity robot reported an integer handling issue > > > (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) in the potentially overflowing expression: > > > > > > (mtd_div_by_ws(mtd->size, mtd) - mtd_div_by_ws(offs, mtd)) * > > > mtd_oobavail(mtd, ops) > > > > > > While such overflow will certainly never happen due to the numbers > > > handled, it is cleaner to fix this operation anyway. > > > > > > The problem is that all the maths include 32-bit quantities, while the > > > result is stored in an explicit 64-bit value. > > > > > > As maxooblen will just be compared with a size_t, let's change the > > > type of the variable to a size_t. This will not fix anything but will > > > clarify a bit the situation. Then, do an explicit cast to fix Coverity > > > warning. > > > > > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 184180 ("Integer handling issues") > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > I forgot to add the link to the corresponding Travis-CI job: > > https://travis-ci.org/miquelraynal/u-boot/builds/456679982 > > Gentle ping on this series (patch 1 & 2). They do apply cleanly on > current master. > > Tom, shall I expect you to take it or is it Jagan's mission?
My current feeling is this goes via Jagan's tree and I wasn't expecting them in for this release. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
