Hi Bin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Bin Meng <[email protected]> > Sent: 2019年5月16日 20:10 > To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; Simon Glass <[email protected]>; > Tom Rini <[email protected]> > Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]>; Sudhanshu > Gupta <[email protected]>; U-Boot Mailing List > <[email protected]>; Ran Wang <[email protected]>; Bhaskar > Upadhaya <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] armv8: ls1028a: Add NXP LS1028A > SoC support > > > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:50 PM Yuantian Tang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Ls1028a Soc is based on Layerscape Chassis Generation 3.2 architecture > > with features: > > 2 ARM v8 Cortex-A72 cores, CCI400, SEC, DDR3L/4, LCD, GPU, TSN > > ENETC, 2 USB 3.0, 2 eSDHC, 2 FlexCAN, 2 SPI, SATA, 8 I2C controllers, > > 6 LPUARTs, GPIO, SAI, qDMA, eDMA, GIC, TMU etc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudhanshu Gupta <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Rai Harninder <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <[email protected]> > > --- > > v3: > > -- fix some issues > > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig | 39 ++- > > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Makefile | 4 + > > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c | 3 + > > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/doc/README.soc | 51 ++++ > > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ls1028a_serdes.c | 73 ++++++ > > arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 280 > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h | 61 +++++ > > .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch3.h | 9 + > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/soc.h | 1 + > > .../asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/stream_id_lsch3.h | 2 +- > > 10 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode > > 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ls1028a_serdes.c > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > > > I really would like to see complete DM driver support on this new platform. > Please consider converting appropriate codes to driver model. If there is no > proper uclass model, please propose one and discuss it on the list. I see the > existing NXP PowerPC support is stuck in such a situation that lots of codes > are still non-DM and we are getting close to the DM deadline. I don't want to > see such happens again in the NXP ARM support. Could you please be more specific which part of code is non-DM based? I checked it and didn't find where is non-DM. Thanks for your review.
BR, Andy > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
