On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:33:18AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 10/15/19 5:18 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:02:09PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >>On 10/11/19 9:55 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >>>I hope this patch set will be reviewed promptly as I'm aiming to > >>>push my "UEFI secure boot" patch for v2020.01. > >>> > >> > >>How can I make all of these new files being built to check for build > >>warnings? > > > >As always in my case of UEFI secure boot, they have gone through build and > >run/tests as part of UEFI secure boot. This is also true for RSA > >extension as UEFI secure boot is the only user of those features. > > Did you run them through Travis?
As far as this patch set is concerned, no configuration enables any of kconfig options listed below and running Travis doesn't make sense. -Takahiro Akashi > > > >Please note that almost of all the code here come from the latest > >linux code without any changes. A few changes that I made are > >quite U-Boot/UEFI-secure-boot specific and is *best* tested through > >UEFI secure boot test. > > > >That said, you can at least build the code by enabling > > Library routines > > Security support > > Asymmetric Key Support > > CONFIG_ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE > > CONFIG_X509_CERTIFICATE_PARSER > > CONFIG_PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER > > > >>Please, provide unit tests for the patch series. > > > >As I said above, it will be exercised and tested under UEFI secure boot > >test. > > If there is nothing I can test now, I would not know how to evaluate > these patches. > > There is good reason that we have unit tests and don't simply say U-Boot > can be tested by booting Linux. > > > > >>Please, provide a documentation how these different tools and files work > >>together. > > > >What do you mean by different tools? > >Asn1 compiler and what? > >Do you want to have doc/README.asn1compiler? > > This patch series provides some puzzle pieces but doesn't tell me how > they fit together. Maybe a README describing the different elements > provided for UEFI secure boot would be most appropriate. > > Best regards > > Heinrich > > > > >Thanks, > >-Takahiro Akashi > > > > > >>Best regards > >> > >>Heinrich > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot