On 2/19/20 6:31 PM, Dalon L Westergreen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 18:11 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 2/19/20 1:25 PM, chee.hong....@intel.com wrote: >>> From: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong....@intel.com> >>> Add board_fit_config_name_match() for matching board name withdevice tree >>> files in FIT image. This will ensure correct DTBfile is loaded for different >>> board type. Currently, we are notsupporting multiple device tree files in >>> FIT image therefore thisfunction basically do nothing for now. >>> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong....@intel.com>--- arch/arm/mach- >>> socfpga/board.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c b/arch/arm/mach- >>> socfpga/board.cindex 7c8c05c..5757041 100644--- a/arch/arm/mach- >>> socfpga/board.c+++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c@@ -86,3 +86,13 @@ int >>> g_dnl_board_usb_cable_connected(void) return 1; } #endif++#ifdef >>> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD+__weak int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name) >> >> Why is this __weak ? > > The intent is to allow users to override this in their specific board > implementation.
OK. Please add that into the commit message.