Dear Stefan,
In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
> With the removal of bi_memstart & bi_memsize, this patch now moves the
> references to the better suiting gd->ram_base/ram_size variables.
This sounds as if bi_memstart & bi_memsize have already been
removed, in whih case the patch order would be wrong as it would
be unbisectable ; but if I see his right the actual removel will
only follow in later patches ("[PATCH v4 7/9] powerpc: Remove
bi_memstart & bi_memsize assignments in spl.c" etc.) ?
In this case it might be better to write something like:
"With the _planned_ removal ..."
or such?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected]
This was an amazing creation using small squares of compressed
vegetable matter on which letters were made by means of small carbon
particles from a stylus, giving an effect similar to the traditional
word-processor screen. It seemed amazingly portable and I never once
saw him have to change the batteries.
- Terry Pratchett & Stephen Briggs, _The Discworld Companion_
