Hi Wolfgang,

On 18.08.20 12:35, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
With the removal of bi_memstart & bi_memsize, this patch now moves the
references to the better suiting gd->ram_base/ram_size variables.

This sounds as if bi_memstart & bi_memsize have already been
removed, in whih case the patch order would be wrong as it would
be unbisectable ; but if I see his right the actual removel will
only follow in later patches ("[PATCH v4 7/9] powerpc: Remove
bi_memstart & bi_memsize assignments in spl.c" etc.) ?

In this case it might be better to write something like:

"With the _planned_ removal ..."

or such?

Okay. I'll update the commit text accordingly in the next version.

Thanks,
Stefan

Reply via email to