Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:19 PM Wolfgang Wallner <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > -----"Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> schrieb: ----- > > Betreff: Re: [PATCH v3 02/57] x86: acpi: Add base asl files for common x86 > > devices > > > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 07:50, Wolfgang Wallner > > <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > -----"Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> schrieb: ----- > > > > Betreff: [PATCH v3 02/57] x86: acpi: Add base asl files for common x86 > > > > devices > > > > > > > > Add common x86 ASL files, taken from coreboot. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/chromeos.asl | 108 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/cpu.asl | 25 ++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/cros_gnvs.asl | 29 +++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/lpc.asl | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/pci_osc.asl | 21 ++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/pcr.asl | 80 ++++++++++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/ramoops.asl | 32 +++++ > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/sleepstates.asl | 12 +- > > > > 8 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/chromeos.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/cpu.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/cros_gnvs.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/lpc.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/pci_osc.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/pcr.asl > > > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi/ramoops.asl > > > > > > There are recent (~June 2020) commits in coreboot which convert most ASL > > > files > > > to ASL 2.0. The ASL 2.0 syntax is much easier to read IMHO, and I think it > > > would be good to update this patch to take advantage of the recent > > > coreboot > > > developments. See e.g. the commit at [1]. > > > > Yes that looks nicer, but I have everything working and tested now so > > don't want to go back and unpick things. This seems like something we > > can pick up once we finally have this in the tree. The good thing is > > that this is just a syntax change as I understand it. > > Fair enough. Yes, it should only be a syntax change. > > Regardingn testing: I haven't tested individual patches of part D, but I have > tested the complete series. After applying the fix for the DSDT length my > ApolloLake board has booted reliably with ACPI enabled. >
Will you add the "Tested-by" tag for this series? BTW: any plan to upstream your board support? > I have some remaining issues that I haven't gone after yet (e.g. I see a > machine check error in the log), but the board always boots. > Regards, Bin
