On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:09:03AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Heinrich, > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 17:58, Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 12/6/21 16:11, Simon Glass wrote: > > > At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot > > > are assumed, implied or unsaid. Add some documentation to cover how > > > devicetree is build, how it can be modified and the rules about using > > > the various CONFIG_OF_... options. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > This patch attracted quite a bit of discussion here: > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > > > I have not included the text suggested by François. While I agree that > > > it would be useful to have an introduction in this space, I do not agree > > > that we should have two devicetrees or that U-Boot should not have its own > > > things in the devicetree, so it is not clear to me what we should actually > > > write. > > > > > > The 'Devicetree Control in U-Boot' docs were recently merged and these > > > provide some base info, for now. > > > > As you already remarked part of this text has not been agreed upon. > > > > Please, either remove this part of the text or mark it as your private > > opinion. > > Do you mean the comment after the patch? It won't appear in the commit > message.
I believe he's referring to that section of the document itself, which is still not agreed on / to. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
