On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:51:23PM +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > Hi Tim et al. > > On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 11:08 -0800, Tim Harvey wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:34 AM ZHIZHIKIN Andrey > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Tim, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: U-Boot <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tim Harvey > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:48 PM > > > > To: u-boot <[email protected]>; Stefano Babic <[email protected]>; > > > > Fabio Estevam > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Schrempf Frieder <[email protected]>; Adam Ford > > > > <[email protected]>; Marcel Ziswiler <[email protected]>; Jagan Teki > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found > > > > > > > > Stefano and Fabio, > > > > > > > > I'm seeing the imx8mm_venice_defconfig target failing to build on > > > > master due to mkimage_fit_atf.sh not found: > > > > ./"arch/arm/mach-imx/mkimage_fit_atf.sh" \ > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x.dtb > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw72xx-0x.dtb > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw73xx-0x.dtb > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dtb > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7902.dtb > u-boot.its > > > > /bin/sh: 1: ./arch/arm/mach-imx/mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found > > > > > > > > > > This has been dropped in d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit generator > > > script") > > > > So why was that merged when it breaks several boards that are not > > switched to binman because of the CI issue? > > I have to admit that I did not closely follow that discussion lately. But it > seems to me that this should be > solvable, not? > > Anyway, at least in my local buildman use case just touching resp. binary > blob file names helped me getting > thought this: > > ⬢[zim@toolbox u-boot.git]$ touch lpddr4_pmu_train_1d_imem.bin > ⬢[zim@toolbox u-boot.git]$ touch lpddr4_pmu_train_1d_dmem.bin > ⬢[zim@toolbox u-boot.git]$ touch lpddr4_pmu_train_2d_imem.bin > ⬢[zim@toolbox u-boot.git]$ touch lpddr4_pmu_train_2d_dmem.bin > ⬢[zim@toolbox u-boot.git]$ touch bl31.bin > > Couldn't that somehow also be done for CI?
There's a whole thread on making binman be able to fake things out in
this case, so that it doesn't require too much special casing within CI
itself.
> > > > As far as I can tell the other boards that are still using
> > > > SPL_FIT_GENERATOR also fail due to this (ie imx8mm_beacon_defconfig,
> > > > imx8mq_evk_defconfig, imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2_defconfig, etc).
> > >
> > > imx8mq_evk is already converted and I've sent a patch for it, see [1].
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What is the state of the binman conversion? I submitted a series to
> > > > convert my boards to binman and it has just been sitting without any
> > > > response for months now [1].
> > >
> > > I believe that the reason for your series sitting in the queue is the
> > > same as
> > > for imx8mq_evk: missing binary blobs (ATF and DDR) are failing CI builds.
> > >
> >
> > Right, so imx8mq_evk (and others) are completely broken for the
> > pending release correct?
> >
> > Sounds like we need to revert d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit
> > generator script")
>
> I kind of agree. However, much smarter would be to finish that binman
> conversion which I also still have one in
> flight [1] plus the follow on patch series [2] (plus an unrelated i.MX 8M
> Plus board addition [3]) all still
> sitting there idle since October with acks resp. reviewed-bys in place!
Yes, I am hopeful many outstanding things in this area will get picked
up after v2022.01 is released. Might it make sense to revert what Tim
suggested for now tho?
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
