Hi Michael,
On 1/26/23 17:47, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 22:14, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:57:57 +0530
Hi,
The master branch seems broken with recent changes on binman, I found
that u-boot.itb is not creating for evb-rk3568 boards.
HEAD
commit 17e8e58fe62c019b2cc26af221b6defc3368229f
Merge: 4e1ab2065e cd108f2795
Author: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Jan 24 21:07:01 2023 -0500
Any insight?
Well, here is my insight:
As long as the only board supported board in mainline is an evaluation
board that nobody in the community has, it won't be tested. Can we
somehow make progress in getting some of the more popular RK356x
boards (like the quartz64, nanopi r5s, raxda rock 3) in the tree?
fyi: radxa-cm3 is part of Mailing list.
Maybe we should setup some embedded lab, with boards. We are working
to create some new testing boards to
be use remotely for CI and developers. Do we have a way to make this
setup for u-boot?
FWIW, we're interested too. We already have a LAVA lab for KernelCI so
*our* solution will likely involve this. I know Mark Brown has interest
in reusing LAVA too. I'm unfortunately lacking time to look at this
properly at the moment. If you work out something, please present
something at some conference or write a blog article :)
Tom shared the following information when I shared my interest in
automated testing:
https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/develop/py_testing.html#testing-real-hardware
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks
https://labgrid.com/ (seems to be down now)
Cheers,
Quentin