On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:39:59AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Then for the next cycle, we should plan on adding this > > fdt_increase_size() into the common fdt_status_disabled(). > > > > Does it work? > > Now that the situation is pretty much clear I am not overly concerned for > colibri-imx7s. > > Do we consider this something to be worried about for other boards?
The cases calling fdt_status_disabled itself are small enough that I think a quick audit isn't unreasonable (and PowerPC should probably mirror the kernel and pass -p 0x1000 in DTC_FLAGS so it becomes a non-issue). -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
