On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:14:57AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:39:59AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > Then for the next cycle, we should plan on adding this > > > fdt_increase_size() into the common fdt_status_disabled(). > > > > > > Does it work? > > > > Now that the situation is pretty much clear I am not overly concerned for > > colibri-imx7s. > > > > Do we consider this something to be worried about for other boards? > > The cases calling fdt_status_disabled itself are small enough that I > think a quick audit isn't unreasonable (and PowerPC should probably > mirror the kernel and pass -p 0x1000 in DTC_FLAGS so it becomes a > non-issue).
Do we expect this to not affect fdt_setprop() or other fdt_*() APIs? fdt_increase_size() seems not to be used most of the time, unless I am missing something here. Francesco
