On 9/3/23 22:57, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> As described in [1], the "clocks" property contains "a phandle to the
> clock device node, an index selecting between gated clocks (0) and other
> clocks (1), and an index specifying the clock to use." The current version
> of the clock driver, unlike the kernel, is currently able to properly
> handle nodes with "clocks" properties with an index set to 0.
> 
> This patch is preparatory for future developments that require the use
> of the DSI clock.
> 
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binac...@amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32f469-disco-u-boot.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/stm32f469-disco-u-boot.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm/dts/stm32f469-disco-u-boot.dtsi
> index dcc70369cd0d..8e781c5a7b23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/stm32f469-disco-u-boot.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/stm32f469-disco-u-boot.dtsi
> @@ -90,6 +90,11 @@
>       bootph-all;
>  };
>  
> +&dsi {
> +     clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB2_CLOCK(DSI)>,
> +              <&clk_hse>;
> +};
> +
>  &gpioa {
>       bootph-all;
>  };
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>

Thanks
Patrice

Reply via email to