Dear Lei Wen, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by > byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the responding > register according to CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE.
Can you please explain on what board, and with which tool chain, you see any problems? > +- CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MAX_REG_SIZE: > + Define the ns16550 max register size, > + if the CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE is smaller than this value, > + use padding to fill those gap. This makes no sense to me. A register is always one specific size, so the term "MAX_REG_SIZE" is bogus. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] Landru! Guide us! -- A Beta 3-oid, "The Return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
