Hi Jonas,
On 2/5/24 14:05, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Hi Quentin,
On 2024-02-05 10:47, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Jonas,
On 2/4/24 21:53, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Testing has shown that writing to eMMC using a slower mode then HS200
typically generate an ERROR on first attempt on RK3588.
# Rescan using MMC legacy mode
=> mmc rescan 0
# Write a single block to sector 0x4000 fails with ERROR
=> mmc write 20000000 4000 1
# Write a single block to sector 0x4000 now works
=> mmc write 20000000 4000 1
With the MMC_SPEED_MODE_SET Kconfig option enabled.
Writing to eMMC using HS200 mode work more reliably than slower modes on
RK35xx boards. Enable MMC_HS200_SUPPORT Kconfig option by default to
prefer use of HS200 mode on RK356x and RK3588.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>
---
Changes in v2:
- Imply MMC_HS200_SUPPORT and SPL_MMC_HS200_SUPPORT in arch Kconfig
instead of adding to each boards defconfig
- R-b tags not collected because of above change
- Combine changes for rk356x and rk3588 in one patch
- Update commit message
Link to v1: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1891693/
---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 4 ++++
configs/nanopi-r5c-rk3568_defconfig | 2 --
configs/nanopi-r5s-rk3568_defconfig | 2 --
configs/radxa-e25-rk3568_defconfig | 2 --
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
index 6ff0aa6911e2..946ef5d7023d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
@@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ config ROCKCHIP_RK3568
imply OF_LIBFDT_OVERLAY
imply ROCKCHIP_OTP
imply MISC_INIT_R
+ imply MMC_HS200_SUPPORT if MMC_SDHCI_ROCKCHIP
MMC_SDHCI_ROCKCHIP is also required for eMMC on RK3399, which would
change the current default, at the very least for Puma RK3399.
Doing a:
rg -lU --multiline-dotall 'RK3399.*MMC_HS.*' configs/
Only returns:
configs/evb-rk3399_defconfig
configs/pinebook-pro-rk3399_defconfig
and there are 29 defconfigs for RK3399-based boards right now, so maybe
that's a bit too big of a change?
The imply statements added in this patch should only affect
ROCKCHIP_RK3568 and ROCKCHIP_RK3588, nothing should change for RK3399,
at least not intentionally.
Clearly misread the patch, sorry for the noise.
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
Cheers,
Quentin
