On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:16:14AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> > tree
> > 
> > > Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken care
> > of
> > > in either the linker script or the binman dts?
> 
> Sorry, I am not sure what you mean.

I mean, why are things placed in this position to start with? Why is the
device tree not already in a place where we aren't smashing it at run
time? Is this a problem of the alignment / placement of items in a blob?
A runtime placement problem? What?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to