> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device > tree > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:16:14AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt > device > > > tree > > > > > > > Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken > care > > > of > > > > in either the linker script or the binman dts? > > > > Sorry, I am not sure what you mean. > > I mean, why are things placed in this position to start with? Why is the > device tree not already in a place where we aren't smashing it at run > time? Is this a problem of the alignment / placement of items in a blob? > A runtime placement problem? What?
Whether binman or not. I think u-boot.dtb is padded just end of u-boot-nodtb.bin. Not alignment or else. This is a common issue, bss should not be written before reloc_fdt. Regards, Peng. > > -- > Tom
