On May 4, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> This seems to have a higher potential for false positives than a checksum. > > My feeling is the feature should not have false positives, the goal should be > to be as good as a checksum. I believe my v2 version of this patch satisfies this goal. Someone else might try to add features that break that, however. > > - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
