Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 10:00, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 06.01.25 15:47, Simon Glass wrote: > > This test was hamstrung in code review so this series is an attempt to > > complete the intended functionality: > > > > - Check memory allocations look correct > > - Check that exit-boot-services removes active-DMA devices > > - Check that the bootflow is still present after testapp finishes > > > > The EFI functionality duplicates bootm_announce_and_cleanup() and still > > uses the defunct board_quiesce_devices() so a nice cleanup would be to > > call the bootm function instead, with suitable modifications. That would > > allow bootstage to work too. > > > > This series is based on sjg/master since the EFI logging was rejected so > > far. > > Yes, it was rejected because a solution at the lib/log.c level would be > more generic.
As I mentioned, that idea isn't suitable for programmatic use. > > Tom suggested not to send patches that are for private enjoyment to the > mailing list. My contributions to U-Boot are only ever about private enjoyment :-) Do you have any comments on the patches? Regards, Simon