On 07.01.25 13:15, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 10:00, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:On 06.01.25 15:47, Simon Glass wrote:This test was hamstrung in code review so this series is an attempt to complete the intended functionality: - Check memory allocations look correct - Check that exit-boot-services removes active-DMA devices - Check that the bootflow is still present after testapp finishes The EFI functionality duplicates bootm_announce_and_cleanup() and still uses the defunct board_quiesce_devices() so a nice cleanup would be to call the bootm function instead, with suitable modifications. That would allow bootstage to work too. This series is based on sjg/master since the EFI logging was rejected so far.Yes, it was rejected because a solution at the lib/log.c level would be more generic.As I mentioned, that idea isn't suitable for programmatic use.
What can be done with show_addr("mem", rec->memory); that log_debug()
does not offer or which you could not do with a new log function in
lib/log.c that takes variadic arguments?
Best regards
Heinrich
Tom suggested not to send patches that are for private enjoyment to the mailing list.My contributions to U-Boot are only ever about private enjoyment :-) Do you have any comments on the patches? Regards, Simon
