On Tuesday 7 January 2025 12:30:40 Central European Standard Time Stefan Roese
wrote:
> On 31.12.24 17:49, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-uart", .data = PORT_JZ4780 },
> > { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-uart", .data = PORT_NS16550 },
> > { .compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart", .data = PORT_NS16550 },
> >
> > + { .compatible = "intel,xscale-uart", .data = PORT_NS16550 },
>
> Looking at the Linux 8250 of_device_id struct I see this entry:
>
> { .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-uart",
> .data = (void *)PORT_XSCALE, },
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to use this compatible property instead?
I was going by the logic that intel,xscale-uart is more generic. They use
identical platform data, so it would be no problem at all.
Regards,
--
Duje
