On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:30:02AM +0200, Philip Oberfichtner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Philip Oberfichtner wrote: <...> > > > > Is it really worth adding this much of extra code? > > Ping @Marek: So are you in favor of this surplus of code?
Hi Marek, You criticised the patch in its current form. Nevertheless, I'm left in the dark which outcome you would approve of. If I'm not missing out on something, we have three options: (a) Use the value zero to disable size limits, as this series proposes (b) Use XXX_HAS_SIZE_LIMIT consistently, implying a lot of extra code (c) Maintain the status quo, which is 80% of (a) and 20% of (b) I'd like to bring this thing to an end, finally. So could you please position yourself? Best regards, Philip
