Hi, Marek, I am ready to add a few new part numbers.
Do you have a preferred format yet for the table? I can upload the patch for the new part numbers and address the format in the future. Regards, Victor ________________________________ From: Vlim <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 18:53 To: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>; Takahiro Kuwano <[email protected]>; Tom Rini <[email protected]>; Tudor Ambarus <[email protected]>; Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu <[email protected]>; Vignesh R <[email protected]>; havish.mutya <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: Reformat the table Thanks, Marek, Can you please show me the preferred format? This was the original format, { INFO("gd25q32", 0xc84016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB) }, This one looks cleaner. {INFO("gd25b256", 0xc84019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) }, Regards, Victor ________________________________ From: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 18:07 To: Vlim <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>; Takahiro Kuwano <[email protected]>; Tom Rini <[email protected]>; Tudor Ambarus <[email protected]>; Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu <[email protected]>; Vignesh R <[email protected]>; havish.mutya <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: Reformat the table [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] 此为外部邮件,谨防钓鱼邮件,请注意邮件是否涉及敏感信息 This is an external email, beware of phishing emails. Please pay close attention to whether the email contains sensitive information On 10/28/25 9:33 PM, Vlim wrote: > Hi, Marek, Hello Vlim, > 1. > reformat the table to follow this format. > > { > INFO("gd25q32", 0xc84016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | > SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB) > }, Why this way ? Does it bring any improvement, aside from being less concise ? > 1. > Re-arrange the order of the table based on the ID, so that I can group the > part #s by product family. Sure. I'll just wait for the maintainer and whichever patch they pick first, the other will be rebased and resent. > 2. > I have a few more part numbers to add to the table, can I add them with this > update? Sure. > 3. > Do I submit as a new patch? Yes, but please, let's wait for maintainer input first. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut

