On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 12:07:25AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 12:03 AM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:58:50PM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:46 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:43:02PM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:34 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:31:51PM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:26 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:25:03PM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:19 PM Tom Rini > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:06:59PM +0800, Sune Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 10:54 PM Tom Rini > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 10:58:21AM +0800, Sune Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:51 PM Tom Rini > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:49:37PM +0800, Sune > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The commits after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > c08da5d03c2a0b72e81a11ff7ca507e3a6414db3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All Cyclone V boards are unable to boot, not sure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this patch is the fix? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, those commits were unintentional and have been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reverted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Had tested the last commit > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6a1bdb7e952d5841f42742fefa907cae5dc8d50a > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same situation that the boards are unable to enter > > > > > > > > > > > > > the SPL phase. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The commit 8de6e8f8a076d2c9b6d38d8563db135c167077ec > > > > > > > > > > > > > works properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > After that things are broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please give > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > > > > > > > > > a try as I think it might have been working before by > > > > > > > > > > > > alignment luck > > > > > > > > > > > > rather than design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is the revert itself that is broken. > > > > > > > > > > > I tested f4dfa5d3c2680322fd17fcc7c6221876e00a03c2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U-Boot SPL 2026.01-00754-gf4dfa5d3c268-dirty (Jan 29 2026 > > > > > > > > > > > - 22:56:17 +0800) > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to boot from MMC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which revert is correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But once dc2d8423b19d30472b02e02b41504226908a4291 > > > > > > > > > > > And revert to 431f1ce46bbffff0db8f03437a34400b11b30175 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then all these broken I don't understand why even file > > > > > > > > > > > diff cannot > > > > > > > > > > > show any changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean the revert is broken and fixed by alignment? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean that arbitrary changes (as part of testing these > > > > > > > > > > things, the > > > > > > > > > > "-dirty" in the version string would lead to failing trees > > > > > > > > > > now passing) > > > > > > > > > > can make the difference between pass/fail to boot. Did you > > > > > > > > > > try Marek's > > > > > > > > > > patch I linked to? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I had tried. Cannot boot same as I had mentioned failing > > > > > > > > > commit #. > > > > > > > > > I apply that patch on the latest master commit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other, maybe, thing is you need a bigger > > > > > > > > SPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN ? > > > > > > > > Otherwise, you'll need to dig more and see why the device tree > > > > > > > > isn't > > > > > > > > being found where expected on your platform, and possibly where > > > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No the failing point is done after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > f4dfa5d3c2680322fd17fcc7c6221876e00a03c2 > > > > > > > Revert "arm: spl: Correct alignment of .rel.dyn section" > > > > > > > This reverts commit 380ddb4. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This commit I tried to boot and works.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then this commit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dc2d8423b19d30472b02e02b41504226908a4291 > > > > > > > count rel_dyn > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I manually replaced the old Makefile.xpl and also worked it boot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then 431f1ce46bbffff0db8f03437a34400b11b30175 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Revert a number of incorrect commits > > > > > > > As part of debugging the appended device tree failure, I > > > > > > > inadvertently > > > > > > > committed some changes as I was debugging to master, and not a > > > > > > > private > > > > > > > branch, and pushed them as part of the release. This reverts > > > > > > > commit > > > > > > > dc2d842 through 380ddb4. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the point that everything no longer boots. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But between those commits there are no extra codes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After that all things no longer work. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and I need you to investigate your failure case here. There is > > > > > > no > > > > > > code change between a working commit and a failing commit, which > > > > > > leads > > > > > > me to the suggestions I gave for debugging. > > > > > > > > > > I even tried a fresh clone from https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot. > > > > > Same situation. > > > > > I don't understand. > > > > > The commit missed or messed up? > > > > > > > > You need to look at the resulting binaries and see why the device tree > > > > is not where it's expected to be. > > > > > > > > You might find it helpful looking through > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/caomzo5biqcp2hyjgrynpqln8q52z05fkjbqvkpxxka8d3cn...@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > for some ideas. > > > > > > So you are suggesting even the commit between revert could introduce this > > > issue? > > > Aren't the revert only applied to two changes? > > > > What I'm saying is that the underlying issue is that the device tree is > > not where it's expected to be. The likely root cause is that we now > > require the device tree to be (correctly!) 8 byte aligned in memory and > > not 4 byte aligned. In the case of appending a device tree to our binary > > any sort of change in the code can change the size of the binary and in > > turn mean that the address where the device tree is ends up being at a > > different alignment. > > You are correct on this, but I don't understand why even reverting to > two code changes > could introduce this issue. > > The revert also included other commits? > > " > Revert a number of incorrect commits > As part of debugging the appended device tree failure, I inadvertently > committed some changes as I was debugging to master, and not a private > branch, and pushed them as part of the release. This reverts commit > dc2d842 through 380ddb4. > " > > This is my debug case: > > Correct boot: > hexdump -Cv spl/u-boot-spl.sfp | grep 'd0 0d fe ed' > 00001ba0 08 00 70 47 6f f0 12 00 70 47 00 bf d0 0d fe ed |..pGo...pG......| > 0000beb0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d0 0d fe ed 00 00 08 c8 |................| > > Fail boot: > hexdump -Cv u-boot-spl_a.sfp | grep 'd0 0d fe ed' > 00001ba0 08 00 70 47 6f f0 12 00 70 47 00 bf d0 0d fe ed |..pGo...pG......| > 0000beb0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d0 0d fe ed |................|
Yup, so it's mis-aligned. I guess can you tell me what the defconfig you're using is? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
