Hi Peng

On January 30, 2026 3:06:04 AM GMT+01:00, Peng Fan <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Francesco,
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] imx9: Kconfig: Enable remoteproc for i.MX95
>...
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/Kconfig
>> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/Kconfig index
>> d9f97e4328c..7051e086072 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/Kconfig
>> > @@ -134,6 +134,12 @@ config TARGET_IMX95_19X19_EVK
>> >    imply BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND
>> >    imply BOOTSTD_FULL
>> >    imply OF_UPSTREAM
>> > +  select CMD_REMOTEPROC
>> > +  select REMOTEPROC_IMX
>> > +  select REGMAP
>> > +  select SYSCON
>> > +  select IMX_SM_LMM
>> > +  select IMX_SM_CPU
>> 
>> Why doing this with a select in the Kconfig?
>> 
>> I would expect either
>>  - you enable what you need in the defconfig
>>  - you add the select to the imx95 soc
>
>There are many defconfigs in NXP downstream for
>a single board:
>$ls -l configs/imx95_19x19_* | wc -l
>21
>I would not changes so many defconfigs.

Why don't you have the common part shared in a single defconfig fragment and 
reuse it without duplicating the content?


Francesco 

Reply via email to