On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:25:48AM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:08:23 -0400, Jason <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since every Dreamplug on the market sets and uses MACH_TYPE_GURUPLUG, I > > think it's reasonable to use it (hopefully merged into u-boot) until the > > linux-arm tree gets sorted out and they accept new boards / machids. > > Then, the last patch can be added. > > If we're going to re-flash a bunch of Dreamplug units with new u-boot, > I'd prefer we go ahead and set a new id. If that means we have to carry > around a local kernel patch for a while until the new id gets merged > into the kernel.org tree, that seems much easier to cope with than > having to flash yet another new u-boot later?
I agree, which is why I included patch 5. I've rebased my Linux dreamplug patches against v3.0 and am doing some testing, Hopefully I can push those out this weekend. I'll add you folks to the CC when I do that. Do you think Linus, GregKH and others would flip if I suggested arch/arm/staging/* ? ;-) thx, Jason. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
